Partly allowed

Md. Jahangir and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2018CR. MISC./51657/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single Judge allowed anticipatory bail to petitioner no.1 in a criminal trial involving Sections 341, 326, 307, 504, 506, 120B IPC, subject to furnishing a bond with sureties within six weeks, while refusing it to petitioner no.2.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner no.1 released on bail subject to bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and surrender within six weeks; bail of petitioner no.2 rejected.

Md. Jahangir and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51657 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -161 Year- 2018 Thana -NATHNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR

¶4

=========================================================== 1. Md. Jahangir S/o Late Md. Munir

¶5

Md. Sonu, S/o Md Jahangir Both resident of Kabirpur Garhiya, P.S. Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ===========================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶9

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶10

Date: 20-09-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for

¶12

the State.

¶13

The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Nath Nagar P.S. Case No.161 of 2018 dated 12.03.2018, registered under Sections 341, 326, 307, 504, 506, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation against the petitioner no.1 is that he had sent his son Sonu and another to kill the informant due to past enmity. The allegation against petitioner no.2 who is son of petitioner no.1 is specific of inflicting knife injury in the back of the informant.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the allegation prima facie appears to be false for the reason that at 4.30

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51657 of 2018 dt.20-09-2018

¶17

2/2

¶18

P.M. in a stadium, which is empty, on the cry of the informant, people could not have assembled and thus the place of occurrence itself being in doubt, the veracity of the allegation becomes suspect.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. submitted that there is specific allegation of inflicting knife blow in the back of the informant by the petitioner no.2. However, with regard to petitioner no.1, he did not dispute that there is only allegation that he was behind the crime.

¶20

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner no.1 be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender within six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Nath Nagar P.S. Case No.161 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

Prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 2 stands rejected.

¶22

	(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Sanjeev/-
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
UploadingDate 20.09.18
Transmission 20.09.18
Date

Md. Jahangir and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Jahangir and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sk. Ashgar Ali @ Aungrej @ Ashgar Ali Vs The State Of Bihar

Sita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Santosh Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Bundi Paswan @ Bunpi Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakshman Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar