Allowed

Bimal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Aug 2018CR. MISC./49404/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 49404 of 2018, heard a petitioner's application for bail in a case under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC. Considering the nature of the accusation and custody period, the court enlarged the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate.

Bimal Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49404 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-854 Year-2017 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bimal Paswan, S/o Sakaldev Paswan, resident of Village- Araraha, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Sri Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate Sri Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : None ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-08-2018

¶13

Heard Sri Vishwajeet Singh, learned counsel, assisted

¶14

by Sri Kundan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared on behalf of the State.

¶15

The sole petitioner, who is in custody since 22.02.2018 on being remanded in the present case from another case, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 854 of 2017, G.R. No. 3589 of 2017, registered for the offence under Section 457, 380 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case nothing was recovered from possession of the petitioner and petitioner has falsely been implicated by way of obtaining confessional statement of this petitioner since petitioner was in

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49404 of 2018(2) dt.20-08-2018 2/2

¶18

custody in another case.

¶19

Be that as it may, considering the nature of accusation and period of custody, let the petitioner - Bimal Paswan be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria / concerned court in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 854 of 2017, G.R. No. 3589 of 2017.

¶20

(Rakesh Kumar, J)

¶21

praful/-

¶22

Bimal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bimal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Irfan Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramdeo Rao Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.