Allowed

Rishi Kumar @ Rishu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Aug 2018CR. MISC./46033/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application arising from an offence under Section 392 IPC, the Patna High Court released the petitioner on bail subject to conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 and the presence of his father as a Surety.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to four specific conditions including court appearance and cooperation with investigation.

Rishi Kumar @ Rishu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46033 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -519 Year- 2017 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District- BEGUSARAI

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rishi Kumar @ Rishu Kumar, S/o Bhushan Singh, R/o Vill- Sihma, P.S.Matihani, Dist- Begusarai

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 28-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶8

The petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2018 in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No.519 of 2017 registered for the offence under 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and has been languishing in custody for more than four months, he has not been placed on T.I. Parade and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused Sumant Kumar @ Sumanta, who is said to have been arrested at the place of occurrence, has since been granted the privilege of bail in Cr.Misc. No.37806 of 2018, vide order dated 16.08.2018.

¶10

Considering the aforementioned facts and

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46033 of 2018 (2) dt.28-08-2018

¶12

2/2

¶13

circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No.519 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

¶14

(1) One of the bailors will be the father of the

¶15

petitioner.

¶16

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶17

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶18

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶19

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶20

PNM

¶21

U T

Rishi Kumar @ Rishu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishi Kumar @ Rishu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Golu Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Laldhari Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Bikku Paswan @ Birendra Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar