Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Rejection of regular bail application in a POCSO case. Court held that victim's statement reiterating allegations against petitioner precludes bail. Ordered expeditious commitment for trial.
What did the court decide?
Application for regular bail rejected; case committed for trial.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26574 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYGHAT District- MUZAFFARPUR
====================================================== Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Sharma, S/o Baidyanath Ram, R/o Vill.Relanarayanpur, P.S.- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
5 07-08-2018
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to a petitioner accused of offences under the POCSO Act and IPC when the trial counsel suggests motive of vengeance but victim testimony corroborates charges.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Sharma
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Anjana Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court