Dismissed

Md. Amjad Ali @ Amjad Ali v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2018CR. MISC./43710/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bench dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail, holding that it was not a fit case. The petitioner was directed to surrender and apply for regular bail within six weeks, noting that police had earlier exonerated him before summoning him during the trial of co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender and seek regular bail within six weeks.

Md. Amjad Ali @ Amjad Ali Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43710 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2015 Thana -KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- KATIHAR

¶3

====================================================== MD. AMJAD ALI @ AMJAD ALI

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar Shrivastawa For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Gulnar Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 25-07-2018

¶6

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

¶7

Earlier, petitioner filed Cr. Misc. No. 13212 of 2015 for grant of anticipatory bail but his prayer for bail was rejected by this court vide order dated 29.06.2015 directing him to surrender before the court below within four weeks and seek regular bail. However, petitioner did not surrender before the court below and, in the meantime, police submitted final form exonerating the petitioner from the case but in course of trial of other accused, the petitioner was summoned by sessions court under section 319 of Cr. P. C taking note of this fact that in course of trial, several witnesses specifically stated that the petitioner gave iron rod below to the informant causing head injury which was found by

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43710 of 2018 (2) dt.25-07-2018

¶9

2/2

¶10

the doctor grievous in nature.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that all the witnesses are family members of the informant and as a matter of fact, after due investigation police found the allegation leveled against the petitioner untrue.

¶12

In my view, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail and, accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed with direction to the petitioner to surrender before the court below and seek regular bail within six weeks from today, and if he does so, the learned trial court shall consider the regular bail application of the petitioner on its own merit particularly, keeping in mind that earlier after due investigation police had exonerated the petitioner from the case.

¶13

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶14

N.K/U

Md. Amjad Ali @ Amjad Ali v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Amjad Ali @ Amjad Ali v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Rai Chandi Nath Sahay Vs Animesh Ranjan and Ors.

Munif Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramakant Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Gaffar Shah Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajan Kumar Tanti @ Chhotu Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukho Yadav @ Shiv Nandan Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar