Allowed

Ashok Thakur v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC25 Jan 2018CR. MISC./4258/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous application sought bail for the petitioner, who was already in custody. The High Court granted bail, directing furnishing of a bond and two sureties in the complained case involving sections 376, 498A, 420 IPC amidst allegations of false instigation.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner Ashok Thakur on bail on execution of bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Ashok Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4258 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2015 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ashok Thakur, Son of Chandeshwar Thakur @ Chandra Shekhar Thakur, resident of Village- Bhadaur, P.S. Deodha, District- Madhubani.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Rinku Kumari D/o Sri Ram Dahin Thakur, R/o Village- Koriya Patti, P.S. Basopatti, District- Madhubani.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. SRI SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 25-01-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶14

Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No.95 of 2015, registered under Sections 376, 511, 498A, 494, 313 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation in brief is that the petitioner’s father promised to marry his son with the informant and physical relationship was also established and later on pregnancy got terminated and subsequently the petitioner’s marriage was solemnized with another girl.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is false, the informant is a working lady and she had taken Rs.2,00,000/- for providing job to the petitioner but failed

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4258 of 2018(2) dt.25-01-2018 2/2

¶18

so petitioner asked to return the money then this false case was instituted and it is admitted position that marriage of the petitioner was never solemnized with the informant.

¶19

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, petitioner Ashok Thakur is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-V, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No.95 of 2015.

¶20

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶21

S.KUMAR/-

¶22

U T

Ashok Thakur v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Thakur v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudarshan Bind Vs The State Of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Jha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shiv Gope @ Shivjee Yadav @ Shivjee Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Amrullah Mansoori Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar