Allowed

Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jul 2018CR. MISC./39117/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application by Dipak Kumar Yadav, who faced arrest in PS Case No.06 of 2018 for offences under Sections 399, 413, 414, 467, 468, 471, and 420 IPC, the Patna High Court granted bail. The petitioner had clean antecedents and no recovery of articles was alleged against him.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner required to surrender within six weeks to be released on bond with two sureties.

Dipak Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39117 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2018 Thana -BHAIRABASHTHAN District- MADHUBANI

¶3

====================================================== 1. Dipak Kumar Yadav, son of Viswanath Yadav, resident of villageDihtol, P.S.- Kaluahi, Dist.- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶4

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sucheta Yadav, APP

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶6

2/ 05-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶7

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bhairab Asthan P.S. Case No.06 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 399, 413, 414, 467, 468, 471 and 420 Indian Penal Code.

¶8

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedents. There is no recovery of any articles from his possession.

¶9

It is alleged that the petitioner managed to run away

¶10

from the place of occurrence.

¶11

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39117 of 2018 (2) dt.05-07-2018

¶13

2/2

¶14

event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Bhairab Asthan P.S. Case No.06 of 2018 , he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶15

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶16

JA/-

¶17

U T

Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjana Kumari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ashok Singh Vs The State Of Bihat Through The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, B

Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Om Prakash Yadav @ Boota Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Azad Chandrabansi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jamal Ahmad @ Sintu Khan @ Md. Jamal Khan @ Jamal Khan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar