Dismissed

Rana Pratap Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Dec 2018CR. MISC./3911/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a domestic dispute where mediation failed owing to his absence. However, the court directed the lower court to grant regular bail immediately upon surrender without prejudice from this order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to surrender before the court below and be granted regular bail immediately without prejudice to the dismissal of the anticipatory bail application.

Rana Pratap Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3911 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1518 Year-2012 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rana Pratap Sahni S/O Chand Sahni Resident Of Village- Aarsi Nagar, Mushari, P.S.- Rusera, District- Samastipur (Bihar)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Rekha Kumari, W/o Rana Pratap Sahni, D/o Suraj Sahni, R/o Village Gudarghat, P.S. Khanpur, District- Samastipur

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.Haque Sahara (App)

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶12

8 10-12-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶15

The application for anticipatory bail was filed on 23.01.2014. The Court in anticipation of restoration of good relationship between the husband and wife, granted indulgence and released the petitioner on provisional anticipatory bail vide order 24.03.2014 and direction was issued for mediation but it appears that the petitioner has not appeared before the Mediation Board and as such the mediation failed.

¶16

Considering the totality of the fact situation, the Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3911 of 2014(8) dt.10-12-2018 2/2

¶18

However, dismissal of the application for grant of anticipatory bail will not cause any prejudice to the petitioner in the event the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail before the court below.

¶19

The Court below is directed to dispose of the application for regular bail of the petitioner upon surrender on the same day without being influenced by the order of dismissal of his anticipatory bail application.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶21

spandey/-

¶22

U T

Rana Pratap Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rana Pratap Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Thakur Vs Patna University and Ors.

Salandhar Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Punam Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nagendra Prasad Singh @ Nagendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Babloo Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar