Allowed

Nagendra Prasad Singh @ Nagendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Dec 2018CR. MISC./20731/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in connection with PS Case No.369 of 2017. The court directed that the petitioner be released on bond if he surrenders or is arrested within one month, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties if he appears in court within one month.

Nagendra Prasad Singh @ Nagendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20731 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-369 Year-2017 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nagendra Prasad Singh @ Nagendra Singh, S/o Jagdish Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Baruvan, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 10-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

¶14

with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 369 of 2017 for the offence under Sections 409, 201 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The Assistant Regional Manager, Bihar State Roadways Transport Corporation lodged written report to the S.H.O., Gandhi Maidan alleging inter alia that incharge of Issue Department submitted a report that on different dates money of diesel has not been written in the Poddar Hand Book and as such the amount of sale of diesel was not deposited in the account of the Department.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. At the relevant time,

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20731 of 2018(3) dt.10-12-2018 2/2

¶18

the petitioner was working as Cashier in Jan Nuram. He submits that the petitioner was superannuated on 31.01.2015 and thereafter he was re-engaged in Jan Nuram.

¶19

From perusal of the written report, it appears that there was no specific allegation against this petitioner. Altogether five persons have been named as accused in the instant case, out of which Raj Kumar Prasad, Nilmani Jha and Krishna Mohan Choudhary have already been granted anticipatory bail by different Co-ordinate Benches of this Court.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid, the petitioner named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within one month from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 369 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶22

uday/-

¶23

U T

Nagendra Prasad Singh @ Nagendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagendra Prasad Singh @ Nagendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Thakur Vs Patna University and Ors.

Salandhar Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Punam Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rana Pratap Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Babloo Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar