Petitioner sought revised pension including arrears but requested and was granted permission to withdraw the writ application as her grievance was redressed.
Permission to withdraw the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2225 of 2017
======================================================
Bibi Nazma Khatoon, Wife of Late Motiur Rahman, resident of village - Haripur, Majrahi Tola, P.O. & P.S. Kaluahi, District - Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar Mr. Asif Kalim For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey- AAG15 For Accountant General : Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha For the SBI : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 29-11-2018 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
Though this writ application has been filed for payment of revised pension including arrears of pension, however, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
anil/-
U
Bibi Nazma Khatoon
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar
The Director, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar
The District Education Officer, District Madhubani
The Treasury Officer, District Madhubani
The State Bank of India, through Branch Manager, Kaluahi Branch, District Madhubani
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
