Code was added in the F.I.R., but regarding said offence also in the F.I.R., it was indicated that mob had taken the mobile and some cash amount. Besides this, it has been argued that earlier also, the informant had lodged a case against petitioners, particularly against son of petitioner no. 1, under Sections 365, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code, vide Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 99 of 2018. In the said F.I.R., husband of the present informant was informant and in the present case, it was alleged, as if, the informant side of the present case when reached near the house of the petitioners, they heard some voice of the victim and thereafter, they entered inside the house of the petitioners, whereas, according to learned counsel for the petitioners, informant side were intruder and forcibly entered into the house of the petitioners and committed crime, for which, from petitioners side, an F.I.R., vide Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 100 of 2018 (Annexure – C to the supplementary affidavit), was lodged for offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 325, 307 & 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 against husband of the informant of the present case and others.
