Pintu Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In this matter, the High Court rejected the petitioner's bail prayer despite the trial being at the final stage of argument. The Court directed the trial court to transfer the case to a running court if vacant to ensure conclusion within two months.
What did the court decide?
Bail prayer rejected; case directed to be transferred to a running court if the trial court is vacant to conclude the trial within two months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32416 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2016 Thana -ISLAMPUR District- NALANDA
(BIHARSHARIFF)
======================================================
- Pintu Kumar,
- Sintu Kumar,
Both S/o Ashok Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village- Tahbal Bigha, P.S.Islampur, District- Nalanda.
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
3 27-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail pending conclusion of the trial which is nearing final argument.
Whether the trial court should transfer the case to a running court if the court remains vacant.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pintu Kumar, Sintu Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sanjay Priya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court