Allowed

Chandra Bhushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC26 Jun 2018CR. MISC./7707/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed the CrPC proceedings against the petitioner initiated under Section 482 CrPC. The court held that the order taking cognizance should be quashed as no material of an overt act existed against him regarding the alleged conspiracy. The petition was allowed at the admission stage.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 01.04.2017 taking cognizance and the entire criminal proceedings against the petitioner are quashed.

Chandra Bhushan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7707 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2010 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandra Bhushan Kumar, Son of Late Laxman Mahto, Residents of VillageBirrakh, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 26-06-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 01.04.2017 passed by S.D.J.M., Purpri, Sitamarhi in T.R. No. 5797 of 2017 arising out of Sursand P.S. Case No. 120 of 2010 whereby the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner under Sections 408 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

In the written report there is allegation that one Indal Mandal informed the informant on mobile that five bags of rice of mid-day meal are being taken for black market. The informant reached the school and inquired from senior teacher Chandra Bhushan Kumar (petitioner) who disclosed that these

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7707 of 2018(4) dt.26-06-2018 2/3

¶16

bags of rice are kept to be sold to Ram Bhagat Panjiyar. The informant reached the house of Ram Bhagat Panjiyar and found five bags of rice of mid day meal.

¶17

The Court below by order dated 01.04.2017 has taken cognizance against this petitioner and other accused persons on the basis of charge-sheet submitted by the police for the offence under Sections 408 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no material against this petitioner in the case diary. The proceeding against other co-accused has already been quashed by this Court by order dated 11.12.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 42362 of 2017. From the impugned order itself, it appears that there is no allegation against this petitioner of committing any overt act. It is only alleged that matter was enquired from this petitioner who told that bags of rice was kept to be sold to Ram Bhagat Panjiyar. It is mentioned in the written report that rice has been recovered from the house of Ram Bhagat panjiyar.

¶19

Therefore, the impugned order dated 01.04.2017 passed by S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi in T.R. No. 5797 of 2017 arising out of Sursand P.S. Case No. 120 of 2010 along with entire criminal proceeding with respect to this petitioner is quashed.

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7707 of 2018(4) dt.26-06-2018 3/3

¶21

This Cr. Misc. petition is allowed at the admission

¶22

stage itself.

¶23

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶24

shyambihari/-

¶25

U T

Chandra Bhushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra Bhushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avin Mandal @ Arbin Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shrawan Patel Mukhiya @ Shrawan Kumar Patel Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Ray and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Santosh Kumar Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shashinand Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar