Allowed

Abhinav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 May 2018CR. MISC./29248/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for offences under Sections 406, 420, 504, and 506/34 IPC. The court characterized the case as a dispute of accounts regarding a government liquor scheme and noted the plea of no criminal antecedent.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each.

Abhinav Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Money Laundering | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29248 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2017 Thana -KESARIA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== Abhinav Kumar, son of Prem Chandra Jaishwal, resident of Mohalla Pratap Patti, PS Sahebganj, District Muzaffarpur

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-05-2018

¶11

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶12

Petitioner, already in custody since 18.3.2018, seeks bail in Kesariya PS Case No. 50 of 2017 registered under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC.

¶13

The allegation in brief is that for the financial year 2014-15 the informant and all accused persons formed a group for allotment of foreign liquor shops under the government scheme, participated in the lottery, one shop was allotted and license was given in the name of Vivek Kumar, elder brother of the petitioner, the petitioner was looking after the shop as a Manager, it is alleged that investment was made by the informant and others also but they are not giving any statement of accounts and have defalcated altogether approximately 73,94,000/- rupees.

¶14

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the license was in the name of his elder brother, as per the allegation itself he was only looking after the shop as a Manager, it is a dispute of accounts, similarly situated another co-accused, father of the petitioner, has been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 22079 of 2018 and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29248 of 2018 (2) dt.10-05-2018

¶16

¶17

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Abhinav Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM XI, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kesariya PS Case No. 50 of 2017.

¶18

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶19

Snkumar/-

¶20

U T

Abhinav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhinav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daya Shankar Diswa @ Daya Shankar Diswah Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Hasnain Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramesh Dhangar Vs The State Of Bihar