Dismissed

Deepak Kumar Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC9 May 2018CR. MISC./27964/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition for bail under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and 34 of the IPC, the Patna High Court, considering the nature of the offence and circumstances, rejected the petitioner's bail plea in a case alleging financial fraud against the State food corporation. The court was satisfied that special and advanced rhythm was not needed in the facts. Bail was thus rejected.

What did the court decide?

Bail was rejected against the petitioner in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 33 of 2015 pending before the CJM, Araria.

Deepak Kumar Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Corruption | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27964 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2015 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deepak Kumar Sah S/o Harish Chandra Prasad Sah, R/o Vill.- Krishnapuri, Kaliflower Mill, P.S.- Khajanchi Hat, District- Purnea, Bihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

The District Manager, the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies, Corporation Limited, Araria.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Bilash Roy Raman

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 09-05-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶15

Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 33 of 2015, registered under Sections 406/409/420/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegation in brief is that this petitioner entered into an agreement which S.F.C for the financial year 2013-14 and had taken paddy worth Rs. 9 crores and odd amount but no C.M.R rice was deposited to S.F.C.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner was pawn in the hand of Brajesh Kumar and Brajesh Kumar had been admitted to anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 33215 of 2015 on

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27964 of 2018(2) dt.09-05-2018 2/2

¶19

17.08.2015, however, there is an agreement in between the petitioner, claming himself a rice mill owner, and the S.F.C.

¶20

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of offence, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 33 of 2015, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Araria.

¶21

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶22

S.KUMAR/-

¶23

U T

Deepak Kumar Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jogendra Bhuiyan @ Yogendra Bhuiyan Vs The State Of Bihar

Devnandan Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajendra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Daya Shankar Diswa @ Daya Shankar Diswah Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Hasnain Vs The State Of Bihar

Jaiwardhan Chakrawarti Vs The State Of Bihar