Dismissed

Santosh Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 May 2018CR. MISC./28656/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order rejects the petitioner's bail application in a criminal case under Sections 392 and 411 IPC for robbery and theft of Rs. 5000. The petitioner was apprehended at the spot after the informant raised an alarm. The court also directed the trial court to expedite the trial to conclude within six months.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail rejected. Trial directed to conclude within six months.

Santosh Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28656 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-471 Year-2017 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Kumar Sah, S/o Om Prakash Sah, R/o Vill.- Mirjanhat, P.O.Mojahidpur, P.S.- Mojahidpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

=========================	... ... Opposite Party/s =============================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.	Shiwesh Chandra Mishra
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. =========================	Binod Kumar 3 =============================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 14-05-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

¶12

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Amarpur P.S.Case No. 471 of 2017 registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian penal Code.

¶13

Allegation in brief is that while informant was returning back to his home after withdrawing Rs. 5000/- from the bank, on the way robbed by miscreants and on alarm raised by him, local people chased the petitioner and apprehended and recovered Rs. 5000/- from the possession of the petitioner.

¶14

Submission is that it was his personal money and petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶15

However, petitioner was apprehended at the spot after chasing away and recovery was also made from his possession and prayer of bail of another co-accused Shanu Ghosh was earlier rejected by this Court.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28656 of 2018(2) dt.14-05-2018 2/2

¶17

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within six months.

¶18

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶19

sujit/-

¶20

U T

Santosh Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kabindra Prajapati @ Kavindra Kumhar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kapildeo Chaudhary @ Kapildeo Chaudhuri Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Azimuddin Ansari @ Md. Guddu Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Gorelal Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Akash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar