Allowed

Zakaullah @ Jakaullah Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 May 2018CR. MISC./25786/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, implicating in an FIR under sections for arson and assault, sought bail. The High Court, noting injuries were simple and police discrepancies, granted bail upon furnishing bonds with sureties to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana, East Champaran.

Zakaullah @ Jakaullah Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25786 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2016 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Zakaullah @ Jakaullah Ansari, son of Late Akhtar Ansari, Resident of Village- Yodopur Bakhari (Tola Tetri), P.S. Dhaka, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 18-05-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶12

The petitioner who is in custody since 13.03.2018 seeks bail in connection with Trial No. 2141 of 2018 arising out of Dhaka P.S. Case No. 44 of 2016 dated 26.02.2016 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 506, 323, 325 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The petitioner as well as the other accused persons are said to have come to the house of the informant and indulged in assault. The petitioner is alleged to have inflicted dabiya blow on the son of the informant viz. Rashid leading to injuries.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the injuries suffered by Rashid are simple

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25786 of 2018(3) dt.18-05-2018 2/2

¶16

in nature. It has further been submitted that despite there being allegation in the FIR against the petitioner, the police did not find the allegation to be true and therefore did not send him up for trial. However the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate differing with the police report took cognizance against the petitioner as well.

¶17

For the aforestated facts, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Trial No. 2141 of 2018, arising out of Dhaka P.S. Case No. 44 of 2016.

¶18

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶19

krishna/-

¶20

U T

Zakaullah @ Jakaullah Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zakaullah @ Jakaullah Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Tinku Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghuvir Bhuiyan @ Raghuvar Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Prasad @ Sudhir Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Aashish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Nishant Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar