Allowed

Amit Ranjan Priyadarshi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 May 2018CR. MISC./24363/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This brief oral order grants bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving alleged loan sanction fraud. The court fixed a bond of Rs. 25,000 and required two sureties, one local with immovable property, subject to standard procedural conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of like amount each, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Amit Ranjan Priyadarshi Vs The State Of Bihar — Money Laundering | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24363 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)

¶3

====================================================== Amit Ranjan Priyadarshi, Operation Assistant-cum- Cashier, S/o- Sh. Arun Kumar Priyadarshi, R/o Mohalla- Bharawpar, P.S.- Lahri, District- Nalanda.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishnu Kant Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 03-05-2018

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Lahri P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has sanctioned loan to fifteen fake persons.

¶9

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing specific has been attributed against him and it is not clear as to what duty he was assigned and there is direct allegation against Saurabh Kumar and Dhiraj Kumar, who have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail vide order dated 11.09.2017 in Cr.Misc. No. 34465 of 2017 and vide order dated 06.09.2017 in

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24363 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018

¶11

2/2

¶12

Cr.Misc. No. 31566 of 2017.

¶13

Heard learned APP also.

¶14

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Lahri P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017, subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned.

¶15

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶16

spal/-

¶17

Amit Ranjan Priyadarshi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Ranjan Priyadarshi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramayan Turi Vs The State Of Bihar

Nagendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Arvind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Prince Kumar @ Prince Singh @Prince Kuwar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Ranjan Kumar @ Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar