Allowed

Karan Yadav @ Karnan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC26 Apr 2018CR. MISC./24201/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act case involving wine recovery, directing surrender within six weeks before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, subject to bail bonds and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail by surrender within six weeks before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, by furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Karan Yadav @ Karnan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24201 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2018 Thana- SIDHWALIA District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KARAN YADAV @ KARNAN YADAV S/o Kashi Yadav, R/o Hasanpur Ahirtoli, P.S.- Sidhwalia, Distt.- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnakar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 26-04-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that 3.410 liters wine is recovered.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery is made from a baswari situated at the back of the house of the petitioner. The said baswari in question does not belong to the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24201 of 2018(2) dt.26-04-2018 2/2

¶18

substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 3.410 liters wine is recovered from the said baswari in question situated at the back of the house of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Sidhwalia P.S. Case No. 1/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Pankaj/-

¶23

U T

Karan Yadav @ Karnan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Yadav @ Karnan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Manorama Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithilesh Rai @ Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bipin Mistry Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Ojha @ Rajanish Kr. Ojha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.