Allowed

Prashant Neelmani v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC22 Mar 2018CR. MISC./16059/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of dowry harassment under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, directing surrender before the judicial magistrate within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on anticipatory bail subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties and complying with conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Prashant Neelmani Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16059 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2476 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prashant Neelmani S/o Ajit Kumar Singh, R/o Gehuni, P.S.Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai- Begusarai, Presently Residing at Bhikhanpura, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar. null null

¶8

Soni Kumari, D/o Bharat Prasad Singh, R/o Pokhraira, P.S.- Sadar, Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prashant Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 22-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

¶13

for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section-498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16059 of 2018 (2) dt.22-03-2018

¶18

Page 2 of 2

¶19

petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 2476 of 2016, T.R. No. 3327 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

A.K.V./U T

Prashant Neelmani v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Neelmani v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Singh and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sri Kapildeo Malakar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Simant Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Satyendra Dubey Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rajendra Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kari Sah @ Kari Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar