Allowed

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2018CR. MISC./14297/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a bail petition by Sunil Yadav in a case involving IPC offences including 307 (attempt to murder). The court considered the petitioner's custody period and the framing of charges before granting bail subject to conditions and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount on conditions.

Sunil Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14297 of 2018 (2) dt.04-04-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14297 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -144 Year- 2017 Thana -PHULPARAS District- MADHUBANI

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Sunil Yadav S/o Hariharnath Yadav, R/o Village- Siswabarhi, P.S.Phulparas, District- Madhubani.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate

¶12

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Adv Ms. Nitu Kumari No.7, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 04-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner, who is in custody since 14.10.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 144 of 2017 (S.T. No.19 of 2018) for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148,149, 323, 324, 307, 353, 332, 333,427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 14.12.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 60091 of 2017.

¶16

It is submitted that charges have now been framed and as such there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶17

Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody already suffered since 14.10.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14297 of 2018 (2) dt.04-04-2018

¶19

satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 144 of 2017 (S.T. No. 19 of 2018) on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶21

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶23

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶24

Chandran/BT

¶25

U T

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Kumar Kedia Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arun Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Umesh Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhopal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Imran Khan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Rai Vs The State Of Bihar