In view of co-accused not being similarly situated regarding specific allegations, the Court saw no reason to alter the bail rejection and dismissed the current prayer for bail.
Bail petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13903 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2017 Thana -MANER District- PATNA
====================================================== Vijay Rai, Son of Raja Rai @ Rajaram Rai, Resident of Village- Chakia Tola, Khaspur, Police Station- Maner, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 04-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13903 of 2018 (2) dt.04-04-2018
2
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/BT
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail by analogy of other similarly situated co-accused having been granted bail in separate proceedings.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vijay Rai
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
