Allowed

Satyendra Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Mar 2018CR. MISC./13288/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving possession of prohibited liquor. The court directed surrender within six weeks and adherence to specific conditions under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail to surrender within six weeks, furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Satyendra Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13288 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2017 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Satyendra Bhagat S/o Kedar Bhagat, R/o Khalilpur, P.S.- Karja, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ANIL PRASAD SINGH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 13-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

¶12

for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 35(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

The prosecution case, in short, is that 3 liters 60 ml wine is recovered.

¶15

There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the local Chowkidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 3 liters 60 ml wine is recovered from by the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13288 of 2018(2) dt.13-03-2018 2/2

¶17

side of the road. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3^rd A.S.J.-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur in connection with Karza P.S. Case No. 139/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

Satyendra Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Sao @ Suresh Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Sah @ Santosh Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakshman Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Nath Pasi Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sajid Vs The State Of Bihar