Allowed

Ram Nath Pasi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Mar 2018CR. MISC./13307/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition arising from a case involving manufacturing and selling of liquor and cheating of consumers, the High Court allowed bail conditioned on surrender within six weeks. The court considered the petitioner's lack of criminal history, the recovery of liquor from a joint family house, and the absence of personal incriminating evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties if surrendering with the court below within six weeks.

Ram Nath Pasi Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13307 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2017 Thana- MAJHAHGARH District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Nath Pasi S/o Munnilal Pasi, R/o Village- Baikunthpur Mathia, P.O.Pratappur Bangara, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. SHANTANU KUMAR ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 13-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 9 liters wine is recovered.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioner where other family members also reside. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13307 of 2018(2) dt.13-03-2018 2/2

¶16

petitioner in this case. It is alleged that total 9 liters wine is recovered from 6 different places. So far as petitioner is concerned, 1 liter mahua wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ADJ-II-cum Special Judge, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 233 of 2017 (G.R. No. 4160/2017), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Pankaj/-

¶21

U T

Ram Nath Pasi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Nath Pasi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Sao @ Suresh Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Sah @ Santosh Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakshman Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sajid Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar