The High Court of Patna received a joint submission from counsel for the appellant and respondent that the parties have entered into a compromise outside the court. The court allowed the appeal to be withdrawn and dismissed it accordingly. No legal issues were addressed in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.227 of 1988
| ==================== Late Ashok Kr. Sinha throu Mansoor Ahmad & Ors ==================== |
================================== gh L.Rs. .... .... Appellant/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s ================================== |
|---|---|
| Appearance : | |
| For the Appellant/s : | Mr. Harendra Nath Ojha, Advocate Mr. Satish Chandra Jha, Advocate Mr. Vivekanand Kumar, Advocate |
| For the Respondent/s : ==================== CORAM: HONOURABL ORAL ORDER |
Mr. Krishna Kishore Sinha, Advocate Mr. Rajni Ranjan Pd.Singh, Advocate Mr. Shyam Sunder Sinha'Shyam', Advocate ================================== E MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR |
21 20-12-2017 Mr. Vivekanand Kumar, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellants, and Mr. Rajni Ranjan Prasad Singh, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submit that parties have entered into a compromise outside the Court. In the circumstances, the appeal be permitted to be withdrawn.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Mkr./-
U
Late Ashok Kr. Sinha throu Mansoor Ahmad & Ors gh L.Rs.
Unspecified Respondent
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
