Single Judge allowed bail to Suraj Kumar in a theft case under Section 380 IPC. Petitioner, not named in FIR, was in custody since registrar of confession. Bail granted on Rs. 20,000.
Petitioner be released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of similar amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.61340 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2017 Thana -PATLIPUTRA District- PATNA
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No.68 of 2017, a case under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. relating to occurrence of theft. He is in custody since 30.08.2017. Name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused.
Considering the material aforesaid as well as the
period already undergone by the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61340 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017
P2/
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Patliputra Police Station Case No. 68 of 2017, with condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Mkr./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who is in custody for a theft case where his name appeared in a co-accused's confessional statement, is entitled to bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suraj Kumar
The State of Bihar
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
