In this oral order, the Supreme Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed Civil Review No. 229 of 2017. The bench found no error apparent on the face of the record warranting review.
The review application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.229 of 2017
====================================================== Chandeshwar Singh, son of Sri Punyadeo Singh, Member, Kesaria Branch of Multi State Cooperative Bhumi Vikas Bank Ltd, resident of VillageKonhiya, P.O.-Konhiya via Kalyanpur, District-East Champaran
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Managing Director, Multi State Sahkari Bhumi Vikas Bank Ltd. Bihar & Jharkhand, Patna
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 08-11-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find no error apparent on the face of the record, warranting review. The review application is, accordingly,
dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J)
Shageer/-
U
Chandeshwar Singh, son of Sri Punyadeo Singh
The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmer Welfare, Govt. of India
The Central Registrar, Room No. 224, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar
The Registrar, Cooperative Department, Government of Bihar
Multi State Sahkari Bhumi Vikas Bank Ltd. Bihar & Jharkhand, Patna
Rajendra Menon
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
