Review petition in an industrial lease dispute dismissed as no error apparent on face of record.
Review application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.225 of 2017
In
LPA 667 of 2016
======================================================
M/s Hari Om Industries, industrial area at Fatuha (Patna) through its proprietor Janardan Prasad Sinha, at present residing at C/o Ram Sewak Prasad, Village- Rahimpur, P.O. and P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna (Bihar) PIN- 804453.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha (Aag 7)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
find no error apparent on the face of the record, warranting review of the matter.
The review application is, accordingly,
dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Shageer/-
U
M/s Hari Om Industries
State of Bihar
Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority
Rajendra Menon
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
