The Patna High Court dismissed a review application filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. The court held that no case for review was made out, relying on principles from an Apex Court decision.
Review application dismissed on grounds that no case is made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.180 of 2017
======================================================
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2, Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
M/s Nirman Re- Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd., 701, VII Floor, Ashiana Chambers, Exhibition Road, Patna
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 29-08-2017 In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Sasi (dead) through legal representatives Vs. Aravindakshan Nair and others: (2017) 4 SCC 692 , no case for review is made out.
The review application is dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sasi (dead) through legal representatives Vs. Aravindakshan Nair and othersReferred¶9
(2017) 4 SCC 692 · Who else cites this
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2, Patna
M/s Nirman Re- Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Rajendra Menon
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
