Quashed
Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal v. Incometax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/12231/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12231 of 2017
======================================================
Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna through its Executive Engineer, Umesh Kumar Rai, S/o Late Radha Rai, R/o Kautilya Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Lal Bahadur Shastri Nagar, District- Patna, PIN- 800023
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, AAG-10 Mr. Abhi Sarkar, Advocate Mr. Naman Nayak, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Archana Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 29-08-2017
This is a dispute between the State Government and the Income Tax Department in the matter of payment of duty and tax said to have been deducted by the department under the T.D.S. system.
Be it as it may be, the fact remains that the
Patna High Court CWJC No.12231 of 2017 dt.29-08-2017 2/3
appeal filed by the State Government is pending consideration before the Appellate Tribunal and as the Appellate Tribunal is not functioning in Patna, the application has been filed for hearing of the stay application. If the Appellate Tribunal is not functioning in Patna, the petitioner herein can approach the Bench at Mumbai and the Chairman of the Bench at Mumbai is authorized to deal with the stay application. On the petitioner filing a certified copy of this order along with appropriate application before the Bench at Mumbai, which is authorized to hear the matter, we are hopeful that the Bench shall consider the issue of interim relief and pass appropriate order on the prayer for stay made by the petitioner before the said Tribunal. In the meanwhile, the petitioner shall ensure that an amount of Rs. 118 crore is kept as a balance in the account of the petitioner. We request the Tribunal to decide the question of stay within a period of two weeks of receipt of a copy of this order.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12231 of 2017 dt.29-08-2017 3/3
With the aforesaid, the writ application
stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
P.K.P.
| AFR/NAFR | N.A.F.R. |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date | 05.09.2017 |
| Transmission Date |
Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Patna
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna
Rajendra Menon
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court