Petitioners admitted compliance with the impugned order, resulting in the disposal of the contempt application.
Contempt Application stands disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.882 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23135 of 2012
======================================================
Munna Prasad & Ors
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh - AAG 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI)
In view of the above, Contempt Application stands disposed off now.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
skm/-
U
Munna Prasad & Ors
The State Of Bihar & Ors
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
