The Patna High Court dismissed an application for condonation of extraordinary delay in filing the petition. Consequently, the Letters Patent Appeal filed by Ramayan Rai and others was also dismissed without addressing the merits.
Appeal dismissed; condonation of delay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1042 of 2014
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6968 of 1991
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Nagendra Rai For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI)
4 02-11-2017 Perused the petition for condonation, which is I.A. No.5354 of 2015. There is extraordinary delay of three years and 43 days, for which no satisfactory explanation has been
Patna High Court LPA No.1042 of 2014(4) dt.02-11-2017 2/2
given.
Even otherwise, the Court is informed that in terms of the Single Judge’s order, a suit has also been filed.
Be that as it may, the condonation application is dismissed. As a consequence, even the appeal is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
sk
U
Ramayan Rai and Others
The State of Bihar and Others
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
