On 20-12-2017, the Bench disposed of a writ petition after counsel for the petitioner submitted that the earlier order had been complied with. No specific relief is detailed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2684 of 2016 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2440 of 2015
======================================================
Sugandh @ Sugandh Yadav, son of Lallan Yadav, resident of village – Golabad, P.S. Naugarh, District Chandouli ( U.P. ) Pin 232111
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... O.P. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Sri Chandrashekhar Verma For the O.P. : AC to AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
6 20-12-2017 Sri Chandrashekhar Verma, learned counsel for the
petitioner in presence of learned AC to AAG No. 12, on instruction, submits that order of the writ court has already been complied with in its letter and spirit.
Accordingly, there is no reason to keep the matter pending.
The petition stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
praful/-
U
Sugandh @ Sugandh Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Mr. Vivek Singh
Mr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh
Mr. Satyajit Kumar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
