Allowed

Md. Shamshad @ Md. Samshad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2017CR. MISC./58200/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a narcotics case, noting that a co-accused in similar circumstances had already been released and the seized quantity was not large, imposing specific conditions on the bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, one being a blood relation, subject to conditions.

Md. Shamshad @ Md. Samshad Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.58200 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2016 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Shamshad @ Md. Samshad, son of Late Md. Abdul Hamid @ Md. Hamid, resident of Mohalla- Fish Market, P.S. Saharsa, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Sri Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Ram Naresh Rai, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 13-12-2017

¶12

Heard Sri Pushpendra Kumar Singh , learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ram Naresh Rai, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

This is second attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier, by order dated 24.11.2016 vide Cr. Misc. No. 34999 of 2016 , the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2016 and in the present case recovered Ganja was weighing only 13.1 Kilogram , which was not beyond commercial quantity. He further submits that one of the coaccused namely Md. Mahtab, whose prayer for bail was earlier rejected, had renewed prayer for bail and by order dated 18.10.2017 in Cr. Misc. No. 36241 of 2017 he has been extended the privilege of bail by this court .

¶14

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor though has opposed the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58200 of 2017(3) dt.13-12-2017 2/2

¶16

prayer for bail , he was not in a position to dispute the fact that co- accused has been granted bail.

¶17

Considering the fact that after earlier rejection of the prayer for bail of this petitioner, the co-accused almost in similar circumstances has been extended the privilege of bail as well as considering the quantity of recovered Ganja, there is no reason to deny the same relief to the petitioner.

¶18

Accordingly , let the petitioner Md. Shamshad @ Md. Samshad be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 /- ( rupees ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge -cumSpecial Judge, Saharsa / concerned court in connection with Special Case No. 03 of 2016 ( arising out of Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 391 of 2016) with condition that one of the bailors must be blood relation of the petitioner and secondly, during trial the petitioner shall remain physically present before the court below on each and every date. If continuously on two dates without prior permission of the trial court he remains absent, his bail bond shall stand automatically canceled.

¶19

(Rakesh Kumar, J)

¶20

praful/-

¶21

U T

Md. Shamshad @ Md. Samshad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Shamshad @ Md. Samshad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Kumar @ Munna Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Sao Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Modi Vs The State Of Bihar

Faiyaj Ahmad@chhote@faiyaz Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr. Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shatrudhan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.