Oral order disposing of a contempt application where the petitioner failed to rebut the position emerging from an earlier order, leading to the conclusion that the application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2308 of 2015 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21181 of 2014
====================================================== Rajeev Kumar Son of Late Ram Mishra, Resident of Village and Post - Devdia, P.S.- Rajapur, District - Buxar
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar Datta For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC9 R N Prasad
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
4 20-01-2017 The position emerging from the order, dated 17.10.2015, annexed as Annexure-1 to the show-cause, is not rebutted by the petitioner.
In view of the same, contempt application stands
disposed off.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
SKM/U
Rajeev Kumar
The State of Bihar
The Bihar Agriculture University
Dr. C.L. Maurya
Mr. Mewa Lal Choudhary
Mr. Aditya Prasad
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
