The High Court at Patna disposed of a contempt application by holding that it was no longer required to speak since the issue was already challenged in another writ application dated 20-01-2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1809 of 2015
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1087 of 2014
====================================================== Ganga Prasad Yadav
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc14 Dr. Anshuman For the Respondent SCC : Mr. Kamla Kant Upadhyay, Advocate Mr. Chandra Bhushan Das, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
2 20-01-2017 Contempt application stands disposed of since the speaking order has now been challenged in another writ application.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
Pawan/-
U
Ganga Prasad Yadav
The State of Bihar & Ors
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
