An oral order dismissing a miscellaneous petition as withdrawn because the matter had already been adjudicated upon in a preceding judgment, rendering the current petition infructuous. No substantive decision other than the withdrawal was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2252 of 2011
====================================================== Parshuram Sao, Son of Late Ramdeo Sai, resident of Village – Sonaru, P.S.Fatuha, District-Patna at present C/o Guptaji, Railway Colony Ward No.18, P.S.-Fatuha, District-Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Union of India, represented through the General Manger, East Central Railway, Hajipur, Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anant Kumar-1, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
3 04-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw this petition submitting that the present petition has become infructuous as judgment in this case has already been passed.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
Mishra/-
U
Parshuram Sao
The Union of India
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
