The High Court of Patna dismissed an appeal filed against a property-related decree after the appellant sought withdrawal citing compromise between parties, deeming the appeal infructuous.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MA No.298 of 2015 (2) dt.04-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.298 of 2015
======================================================
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance:
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sinha No-1 For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
2 04-08-2017 Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the case submitting that the suit has been compromised between the parties and thus this appeal has become infructuous.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
S.Sb/-
U
Most. Bhagia Devi and others
Manoj Singh and others
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
