The High Court at Patna dismissed a contempt application in a civil writ petition involving a retired teacher, noting the remedy of law lies with the petitioner if unsatisfied with the opposite party's decision.
Contempt application dismissed with observation regarding statutory remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1779 of 2015 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17366 of 2014
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, GP 16
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
3 08-02-2017 Contempt application is dismissed now with an
observation that if the order or the decision of the concerned opposite party is not palatable or acceptable to the petitioner, he has remedy in law.
The presence of the District Programme Officer (Establishment) Madhubani stands dispensed with now.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
sk
U
Mahadeo Singh
The State of Bihar through its Secretary
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
