The High Court of Patna allowed the prayer for restoration of CWJC No. 1361 of 2009 against opposite party nos. 5 and 8 due to non-compliance of an earlier order. The Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case was subsequently disposed of.
Restoration of CWJC No. 1361 of 2009 allowed against opposite party nos. 5 and 8.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1114 of 2014 IN
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1361 of 2009
===========================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties
=========================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioners : Mr. Nityanand, Advocate For the Respondents :
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-01-2017
Patna High Court MJC No.1114 of 2014 dt.25-01-2017
2
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. M.J.C. No. 1114 of 2014 stands disposed of.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/BT
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date |
25.01.2017 |
| Transmission Date |
N.A. |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for restoration of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1361 of 2009 against opposite party nos. 5 and 8 should be allowed.
Yogendra Tiwary
Gauri Shankar Tiwary
Kishandeo Tiwary
Brajendra Prasad Yadav
Rahul Roy
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
