A single-judge bench granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under sections 272, 273, 290 of IPC and section 47(A) of the Excise Act, imposing specific conditions on bail bond and appearance.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49721 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2016 Thana -RAMGARHWA District- EASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI)
====================================================== Santosh Kumar @ Vijay Prasad, son of Chhotelal Prasad, Resident of Village Novkathwa, P.O. and P.S. Ramgarhwa District East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 18-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49721 of 2016 (2) dt.18-01-2017
2/2
with the following conditions:
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/Ibrar
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on regular bail pending trial after earlier rejection.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Santosh Kumar @ Vijay Prasad
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
