High Court of Patna dismissed a miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution. The appellant failed to appear, and the court noted lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal, rendering it devoid of substance.
Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.769 of 2010
======================================================
Parbati Devi, wife of Raj Kishor Singh, Resident of village Kaser, P.S.Bhagwanpur District-Kaimur (Bhabhua).
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance:
For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
13 06-09-2017 No one turned up on behalf of the appellant.
From perusal of the record, it appears that no one
turned up on behalf of the appellant on last occasion also. It transpires that the appellant is not interested to prosecute this appeal.
Hence, this miscellaneous appeal is hereby
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
Mishra/-
U
Parbati Devi
Am Public Village Kaser
Rajkeshwar Singh
kamlesh Singh
Jiut Singh
Sudama Singh
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
