8. From perusal of the impugned judgment, it appears that besides other defence taken by the appellant by filing the written statement, it has claimed that the driver of the offending truck did not possess the valid driving licence at the relevant time of accident, hence the Insurance Company is not liable to pay the compensation indemnifying the owner of the vehicle. At most the Insurance Company is liable to pay only 50% of the compensation claiming that there was negligence on the part of deceased as also on the driver of the offending truck in the accident but the learned lower court has neither framed any issues on the aforesaid aspect nor discussed the same in the impugned judgment. Moreover, the learned lower court has also not discussed about the number of dependents of the deceased, the age of the deceased, the loss of dependency and multiplier applied by it for working out the amount of compensation in the impugned judgment and simply mentioning income of the deceased and receiving of the amount of Rs.50,000.00, by way of ad interim compensation by the claimants, has passed the impugned judgment and award, which is quite illegal and unreasoned.
