Patna HC dismissed two miscellaneous appeals as withdrawn after respondent raised no objection.
Both miscellaneous appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MA No.220 of 2016 (5) dt.06-04-2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.220 of 2016
====================================================== Sudhir Kumar Tuli .... .... Appellant/s Versus Harit Vihar Infratech Private Ltd. & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Miscellaneous Appeal No.63 of 2016 ====================================================== 1. Geetanjali Estate Pvt. Limited .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. Harit Vihar Infratech Private Limited & ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance: (In both appeals) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Amit Narayan Ms. Nirmala Kumari For the Respondents Mr. D. K. Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
05 06.04.2017 Both the above stated miscellaneous appeals arise out of order dated 18.12.2015 passed by Sub Judge IV, Danapur in Title suit no. 268/2014 but appellants want to withdraw both the above stated miscellaneous appeals.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not raise any objection.
Accordingly, both the above stated miscellaneous appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
shahid
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
U T
Sudhir Kumar Tuli
Harit Vihar Infratech Private Ltd.
Geetanjali Estate Pvt. Limited
Harit Vihar Infratech Private Limited & ors
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
