The Miscellaneous Appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd. was dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant, defects were not removed, and the imposed costs were not deposited despite multiple calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MA No.608 of 2010 (6) dt.06-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.608 of 2010
======================================================
National Insurance Co. Ltd., Gaya
.... .... Appellant/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s
Asha Devi & Ors.
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
06 06.04.2017
Office report goes to show that neither defects, as pointed out by the office, were removed nor the cost imposed upon the appellant was deposited in favour of Patna High Court Legal Aid Committee.
Therefore, in view of the aforesaid circumstance, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Shahid
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
U
National Insurance Co. Ltd., Gaya
Asha Devi & Ors.
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
