Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants failed to appear on the day of hearing despite previous absences.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MA No.398 of 2009 (7) dt.25-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.398 of 2009
====================================================== Awadh Kishore Singh & Anr .... .... Appellant/s Versus Satyadev Singh & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 7 25-08-2017 No one appeared on behalf of the appellants to advance the argument in the case. From perusal of the records, it appears that on the last two occasions also, none turned up on behalf of the appellants in the case. Thus, it transpires that the appellants are not interested in contesting the case. Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
Sanjeev/-
U
Awadh Kishore Singh
Satyadev Singh
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
