In Miscellaneous Appeal No.527 of 2008, the Patna High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. No one appeared on behalf of the appellants to advance arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.527 of 2008
======================================================
Versus
.... .... Defendant No.9-Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance: For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court MA No.527 of 2008 (9) dt.24-08-2017
2/2
From perusal for the record, it appears that on the last occasion as well, none appeared in the case on behalf of the appellants. Thus, it transpires that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the case.
Accordingly, this Miscellaneous Appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
Mishra/-
U
Hesamuddin @ Hesamuddin Mallik
Naushaba Khatoon
Bibi Sohaila Khatoon @ Sohaila Bano Mallik
Homazarin
Seemazari @ Weemazarin Mallik
Zebazari
Prakasha Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
