An oral order by the Patna High Court where the court was informed that the petitioner's grievance had already been redressed. Consequently, the writ application was disposed of without further relief.
None. The writ application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7694 of 2012
====================================================== Kamlesh Prasad Singh, S/O Shri Yamuna Singh, R/O Vill.- Bhura, P.O.Kenarchatti, P.S.- Wazirganj, Distt.- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jai Kishor Poddar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Radhika Raman, G.P. 23.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. No further relief is sought for in the present writ application.
Hence, the present writ application stands disposed of.
U.K./-
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U
Kamlesh Prasad Singh
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department Government of Bihar
Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar
District Education Officer, Gaya
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
