Twenty-nine petitioners sought writ jurisdiction. The court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission for withdrawal of the application granted. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24934 of 2013
======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.24934 of 2013 (2) dt.09-10-2017
2/2
P.S- Barhara, Kothi, District- Purnea
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Permission is accorded.
The present writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Amit/-
U
Barun Kumar
Manoj Kumar
Saroj Kumar
Sanjay Kumar
Brajesh Kumar
Amrendra Kumar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
