Champaran, but respondent no. 10, who was earlier designated as Incharge was still continuing with the charge of Incharge Headmaster. It appears that initially the respondent no. 10 was made Incharge Headmaster by the respondent no. 9, by order dated 19.10.2016, upon superannuation of the erstwhile incumbent, but subsequently, on a representation filed by the petitioner, the respondent no. 9, by order dated 08.11.2016 made her Incharge Headmaster in view of she being declared senior to the respondent no. 10. However, despite such order being issued, the actual transition on the ground, of the petitioner being given the powers, including that of maintaining registers, was never passed over to her and respondent no. 10 continued to discharge such functions, both on the administrative as well as financial side. The respondent no. 3 intervened in the matter on the basis of representation filed by the respondent no. 10 and by order dated 08.03.2017 directed the respondent no. 9 to make fresh arrangement of Incharge Headmaster in terms of the departmental circular and the order dated 08.11.2016 in favour of the petitioner was stayed. Thereafter , the respondent no. 9 again made the respondent no. 10 as Incharge Headmaster. In the meantime, the petitioner being aggrieved, moved before the respondent no. 7 and order dated 15.04.2017 was issued in favour of the petitioner making her Incharge Headmaster on the administrative
